Bestaan er Joodse Sayanim? (Discussie met Mike Bing)

Ik noemde de gerenommeerde Amerikaanse journalist David S. Broder een ‘sayanim’ in reactie op zijn column waarin hij Obama adviseert een oorlog met Iran te beginnen teneinde de economie uit het slop te halen en zijn herverkiezing als president veilig te stellen.


Een sayanim (Hebreeuws voor ‘helpers’) is (volgens Victor Ostrovsky, een voormalig geheim agent van de Mossad) een Jood die buiten Israël woonachtig is en op vrijwillige basis ondersteuning verleent aan de Mossad.[1][2]


Mike Bing reageerde attent met:


Als je dan toch al een vreemde taal gebruikt om de schijn van deskundigheid te wekken, doe het dan goed: één sayan, meerdere sayanim. De oorsprong van van Wanings uitleg is buitengewoon verhelderend over zijn motieven.

Het grappige is dat de link naar de Google zoekpagina vele correcte verwijzingen geeft zoals:
"Les sayanim (hébreu: סייענים, singulier: sayan, de l’hébreu aide, assistant"
"Sayanim (singular sayan) are shielded from conventional legal culpability by…"

Van Waning doet gewoon wat voor de hand ligt: hij pakt de eerste de beste link – die van een Nederlandstalige Wikipedia pagina

De gelijkwaardige internationale Wikipedia lemma werd na ampel overleg verwijderd om de volgende redenen:
"Delete as per nom. The article is a conspiracy-theory with anti-Semitic overtones. The main source cited is Gordon Thomas, a notable anti-Israel conspriacy theorist."..


Sindsdien zijn Mike Bing en ik verwikkeld in een discussie over de begrippen ‘sayan’ en meervoud daarvan ‘sayanim’.


Ik deed enig bronnenonderzoek (zie onderaan) en Mike Bing reageert daarop met:


Toch wel grappig dat een term ("sayan") die sinds de eerste intifada werd uitgevonden om Palestijnse informanten aan te duiden, nu omgebogen wordt om de schijn van een geheim wereldomvattend leger van super-Joden te wekken en de mythe van de onbetrouwbare Jood weer nieuw leven in te blazen waardoor nu plotseling door heer van Waning en zijn kameraden iedere Jood(en iedere persoon met mogelijk een druppeltje Joods bloed) als verdachte aangemerkt wordt..


Daarom hier de vraag: bestaan er Joodse Sayanim en wat houdt dit begrip in?





Even googlen op de Nederlandstalige sayan-israel leverde al veel artikelen op die de sterke indruk wekken dat het verwijderen van het oorspronkelijk engelstalige Wikipedia artikel niet terecht is geweest.

(Op de engelstalige Google-site ‘sayanim’ en ‘sayanim’ staan duizenden hits die ik nog niet onderzocht).


Sarkozy’s bad week…

As if his marital challenges were not enough cause for concern, "Sarco the Sayan" has suddenly emerged as the most infamous accolade of French President Nicolas Sarkozy. The influential French daily Le Figaro last week revealed that the French leader once worked for — and perhaps still does, it hinted — Israeli intelligence as a sayan (Hebrew for helper), one of the thousands of Jewish citizens of countries other than Israel who cooperate with the katsas (Mossad case-officers).

A letter dispatched to French police officials late last winter — long before the presidential election but somehow kept secret — revealed that Sarkozy was recruited as an Israeli spy. The French police is currently investigating documents concerning Sarkozy’s alleged espionage activities on behalf of Mossad, which Le Figaro claims dated as far back as 1983. According to the author of the message, in 1978, Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin ordered the infiltration of the French ruling Gaullist Party, Union pour un Mouvement Populaire. Originally targeted were Patrick Balkany, Patrick Devedjian and Pierre Lellouche. In 1983, they recruited the "young and promising" Sarkozy, the "fourth man".

Ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky describes how sayanim function in By Way Of Deception: The Making and Unmaking of a Mossad Officer. They are usually reached through relatives in Israel. An Israeli with a relative in France, for instance, might be asked to draft a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an organisation whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the Diaspora. Could the French relative help in any way? They perform many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental car agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could fund someone in the middle of the night if needs be, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police.

And, a political sayan ? It’s rather obvious what this could mean. The sayanim are a pool of people at the ready who will keep quiet about their actions out of loyalty to "the cause", a non-risk recruitment system that draws from the millions of Jewish people outside Israel.

Such talk sends chills down spines, especially Arab and Muslim ones. Indeed, the revelation did not go unnoticed in Arab capitals or come as much of a surprise. Paris can be a sunny place for shady people. When it comes to intelligence gathering on behalf of Israel, a question mark is immediately raised on the moral calibre of the person in question. But, how does this scandal influence France’s foreign and domestic politics?..


Mossad’s licence to kill…

Mossad is one of the world’s smallest intelligence services. But it has a back-up system no other outfit can match. The system is known as sayanim, a derivative of the Hebrew word lesayeah, meaning to help.
There are tens of thousands of these "helpers". Each has been carefully recruited, sometimes by katsas, Mossad’s field agents. Others have been asked to become helpers by other members of the secret group.
Created by Meir Amit, the role of the sayanim is a striking example of the cohesiveness of the world Jewish community. In practical terms, a sayan who runs a car rental agency will provide a kidon with a vehicle on a no-questions basis. An estate agent sayan will provide a building for surveillance. A bank manager sayan will provide funds at any time of day or night, and a sayan doctor provides medical assistance.
Any of these helpers could have been involved in the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. Mossad has recently expanded its network of sayanim into Arab countries…

Mossad’s Little Helpers…

..The use of forged European passports by Mossad agents entering Dubai to assassinate al-Mabhouh has kicked up a diplomatic storm in recent days. The EU issued a strong condemnation of the stolen IDs, indirectly criticizing Israel. Israeli ambassadors in Britain, Ireland, France, Australia and Germany have been called in to discuss the issue, and Israel’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has been given an earful by many of his counterparts. But were the Israeli dual nationals whose foreign passports were allegedly forged unaware that their identities were stolen by the Mossad? Or were they acting as sayanim, the Hebrew word for helpers, whom the Mossad relies on across the globe to provide shelter, money, and logistical support… in this case identity. A sayan, singular for sayanim, must be 100% Jewish, and in many cases a dual national


Israel in America: Obama’s dance of death…

What are we to make of the latest changes in Obama’s entourage, ponders Eric Walberg

Obama has just lost his close friend and chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, who is making the unusual transition from national to municipal politics.He is also losing his closest adviser David Axelrod (pragmatist Emanuel described their difference as prose versus poetry) and his mentor and director of the National Economic Council Larry Summers.

Why are Obama’s three closest advisers — all Jewish — leaving? There is no pat answer. Axelrod is no friend of Summers, having suggested in an email the latter would be more comfortable in the “cafeteria at Goldman Sachs”. He claims he is homesick. Obama’s Keynesianism probably finally got to Summers, who prefers tax cuts. Emanuel, a former congressman, a talented ballet dancer, son of an Irgun terrorist, and an Israeli soldier during the first Gulf war against Iraq, leads us to the real answer.

As a very, very strong Zionist (dual citizen? sayan?), he is Israel’s canary in the White House. Israel boycotted Obama’s UN speech at the Millennium Goals Summit in September, and has subjected Obama to dose after dose of humiliating treatment, the latest when Netanyahu asked for the pardon of Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard (serving a life sentence) in exchange for a temporary halt in settlement expansion. Netanyahu defiantly visited Pollard in jail in 2002 and he is celebrated as a hero in yearly commemorations in Israel. There seems to be an eerie replay of 1991, the last time the White House seriously tried to stop the settlements. The Israel lobby abandoned Bush then and destroyed him in the 1992 elections.

The writing is on the wall: Obama is a one-term president. That is if he is even allowed to finish his first term. Obama was never popular in Israel. When he tried to add Israeli critic Chas Freeman to his team as chair of the National Intelligence Council in 2009 AIPAC blew a fuse. Now there are even threats against his life as a result of his stance on settlements and his reluctance to attack Iran. Loud protests in front of Netanyahu’s residence witness crowds burning effigies of Obama “the new Pharaoh”, “the descendant of slaves” who must be put in his place…


Lockerbie plane bombing
What if they are innocent?…

Without contradicting Aviv, Thomas and others believe the tagging and smuggling aboard of the lethal suitcase can most easily be ascribed to a sayan or mabuah working for Mossad, which had a motive for eliminating certain passengers. (A sayan is a Jew who puts loyalty to Israel above loyalty to his own country and does services, usually unpaid, for Mossad; according to Thomas, the most famous sayan working in the UK was Robert Maxwell. A mabuah is a Gentile who fulfils the same role.)..

By way of deception: The making and unmaking of a Mossad Officer is a book written by Victor Ostrovsky and Claire Hoy about Ostrovsky’s career as a katsa in the Israeli Mossad.

This book is a true story about the Mossad as seen by Victor Ostrovsky. The first part describes his experiences with the organization. It starts when Victor is first approached by the Mossad during his service in the Israeli Defense Forces and is subjected to numerous tests, including psychological ones. While at first rejecting an offer to be trained as a recruit for the assassin’s squad, Ostrovsky eventually accepts an offer to become a katsa and joins a class of Mossad candidates going through tradecraft training. After successfully completing the training Ostrovsky begins working as a katsa (case officer).

Throughout the book, Ostrovsky reveals details of the internal workings of the Mossad itself. Ostrovsky claims that Mossad has access to Jewish helpers all around the world called sayanim (sg. sayan). Their services can be requested on short notice and no questions are asked. Because of this, Mossad only needs 30-40 active case officers at any given time. He also explains the different departments functions and how liaisons are conducted with foreign intelligence agencies.

As he progresses as a katsa, Ostrovsky experiences growing disillusionment with the organization and its leaders, and begins to question its motives. This culminates in his retirement from the Mossad after being scapegoated for a failed attempt at capturing top PLO officials…


..Experts with handles Professional in a field outside of espionage/intelligence who is taken on missions to identify documentation or equipment in their area of expertise.
With handles Metaphor for a parcel.
Tsafririm (Hbw, = morning breeze) Organizes Jewish communities outside Israel and helps to set up frames.
Frames (Misgarot) Jewish self-protection units set up all over the world.
Sayan (pl., Sayanim) Volunteer Jewish helpers outside Israel who collaborate with Mossad, e.g. the London station has 2,000 sayanim on its books.
Tuganim (Hbw, = French fries) Mossad code name for the Hamburg special anti-terrorist police unit who were Mossad-trained…



9 thoughts on “Bestaan er Joodse Sayanim? (Discussie met Mike Bing)

  1. Ik ben blij de eerste te zijn om mee te delen dat deze blog van de heer van Waning niet over Wilders en Groot Israel gaat, in tegendeel hij heeft ondekt dat de hele wereld vol zit met Zayanim (mee dewerkers) niet te verwarren in Zayanim (neukers) het eerste komt van het woord Zayan (helpen en het tweede van het woord Zayin (lul).
    Maar om het nog een beetje ingewikkelder te maken Zayan is ook een vent die waar mogelijk vrouwen verlijd om te neuken (sorry voor de groffe taal, maar hij is begonnen).
    Nu verteld ons meneer van Waning dat Sarkozy, en vele mensen meer, helpers zijn voor de Mossad (de Israelische geheime dienst), meeste hebben daar voor ook een Joodse Grootmoeder, zodat ze altijd kunnen immigreren naar Israel volgens de wet van terugkomst.
    Nu schreef hij ook over Victor Ostrovski, die van spion bij de Mossad is over gegaan naar het schrijven van spion trillers, n weten wij vandaag hoe en waar de Mossad werkt.
    Leuk om te weten dat jouw gewone politie man op de hoek misschien een Zayin is (sorry Zayan), van Waning noemt hun sleepers. En terecht morgen staat er in de krant, de woorden Moses gaat morgen verhuizen, en direct weten de slapende zayanim dat nu de tijd is voor actie.
    Ik weet het, ik had dit niet mogen vertellen, maar mijn civiele geweten heeft mij opgedragen om dit lul verhaaltje te schrijven, (maar natuurlijk netjes en beleefd, zodat ik niet geschrapt word)

  2. "een sayaniem" bestaat niet, simpel omdat het "een sayan" zou moeten zijn. Sayaniem is meervoud.
    Alle Israelische veiligheidsdiensten gebruiken sayaniem, zoals ook 9 v.d. 10 veiligheids diensten rond de wereld. Dit inclusief elke politie macht (staat gelijk aan het Amerikaanse woord ‘informer’).
    In de meeste gevallen zijn het juist niet Joden, en de shabbak bijvoorbeeld gebruikt honderden sayaniem zo niet meer onder de Palestijnen. Dankzij deze mensen heeft Israel de informatie die hij nodig heeft om de terreur te bestrijden. Dankzij deze mensen heeft de Amsterdamse politie de informatie die hij nodig heeft om drugs vervoer te bestrijden. En ga zo maar door.
    Er is niks geheims aan, en je kan er zelfs af en toe in de media over lezen. Zo bijvoorbeeld toen de Palestijnse ‘politie macht’ hun wapens keerde tegen de Israelische machten waar ze samen wacht mee liepen in 1996, werdt er gesproken over een grote veiligheidsblunder (officielen noemden het een grotere blunder dan de jom kippur oorlog), omdat Israel wel vrede sprak met de Palestijnen en gebieden aan hun overhevelde, maar geen rekening had gehouden met de mogelijkheid dat het verkeerd zou gaan.
    Een sayan werkt over het algemeen voor geld of andere bennefits, precies zoals je in goede Amerikaanse films op dagelijks niveau kan zien. However zoals hier boven blijkt, je kan ook een beetje te veel films gezien hebben natuurlijk :-).
    Wel is het zo dat Israelische veiligheidsdiensten in sommige gevallen Joden en/of Joodse instanties over de hele wereld verdedigen. Ook dit is nauwelijks een geheim (toevallig vorige week nog een lang krantenartikel er over gelezen). Dit laatste heeft echter niks met ‘sayaniem’ te maken, en werkt op een heel andere manier.

  3. @Pilgrimheart, Zain betekend mannelijke genotsknots, niets meer en niets minder, geen levenlust en geen zin in hebben. Zayin is precies het zelfde, dat komt omdat de j en i in het hebreeuws dezelfde letter teken hebben, en een jong meisje zo als jij moet mij deze vragen niet stellen, foei (niet serieus bedoeld).

  4. Jan-Willem,
    De kop van je artikel is enigzins misleidend: "Bestaan er Joodse Sayanim?" – Natuurlijk! Christelijke? Jazeker! Franse, Italiaanse, Libanese, Chinese? Ook! Humanistische? Obvious! Atheisten, taoisten, communisten, salafisten, moslims? Vast wel, als de Mossad z’n werk goed doet of minstens net zo goed als willekeurig welke andere inlichtingendienst ter wereld.
    Het tweede deel is echter niet correct: "Discussie met Mike Bing" – er valt niets te discussieren. Jij pikt iets op van tientallen Google pagina’s, quote dan ook nog de verkeerde vorm van het woord en draait de zaken om in de trant van "sayanim zijn joden die…".
    Een beetje op het nivo van "alle joden spelen viool, dus elke violist is een jood". Volgens mij speelt David géén viool ergo sayanim staat niet gelijk aan joden. Bewijs geleverd, discussie heeft nooit bestaan.
    Dat is dan ook meteen het laatste woord wat ik hier aan vuil maak, en voortaan aan de rest van je blog. Het is ’t me niet meer waard om nog op dergelijke domme uitspraken te reageren. Je mag vanaf nu van mij uitkramen wat je wilt – voel je vrij!

  5. Inderdaad speel ik niet de viool, maar ik speel wel de triangel. Men heeft voor mij een symphony geschreven die heet, "Shbang en dat is het einde".

  6. De reacties van mijn trouwe Joodse/israelische volgers David Verveer, E.T. en Mike Bing (waar blijft ‘The Saint’ – nog bezig aan onze discussie ?), helpen niet echt bij de beantwoording van mijn vraag:Bestaan er Joodse Sayanim en wat houdt dit begrip in?
    Volgens hen bestaan die niet, dan wel zijn het gewone informanten waarover alle goede inlichtingendiensten beschikken.
    De Nederlandstalige Wikipedia vermeldt onder ‘Sayanim’: sayanim (Hebreeuws voor ‘helpers’) is (volgens Victor Ostrovsky, een voormalig geheim agent van de Mossad) een Jood die buiten Israël woonachtig is en op vrijwillige basis ondersteuning verleent aan de Mossad.[1][2]
    De ondersteuning – in de ruimste zin van het woord – omvat onder andere medische zorg, geldmiddelen, logistiek en het verzamelen van inlichtingen met dien verstande dat sayanim enkel hun onkosten vergoed krijgen.
    Hoewel er geen officiële cijfers bekend zijn wordt het aantal sayanim geschat op enkele duizenden. De aanwezigheid van dit grote aantal vrijwilligers is een van de redenen waarom de Mossad werkt met minder katsa’s (case officer) dan andere inlichtingendiensten.
    Ostrovsky’s beweringen zijn overigens niet bevestigd door andere bronnen.
    Bronnen, noten en/of referenties:
    ↑ Victor Ostrovsky, Het web van de Mossad: onthullingen van een Israëlisch geheim agent, Weert: M & P, 1991. ISBN 90-6590-479-4
    ↑ Gordon Thomas, Mossad: een onthullend beeld van ’s werelds meest geruchtmakende geheime dienst, Utrecht: Het Spectrum, 1999. ISBN 90-4615-049-6

    Deze pagina is het laatst bewerkt op 25 aug 2010 om 02:42, en het zou me niet verbazen als deze ook wordt verwijderd zoals met de internationale versie is gebeurd, zie:
    Maar onder ‘Sayanim – Search results’ levert de internationale Wikipedia nog interessante bronnen, hoewel het vreemd is dat slechts de eerste page bereikbaar is.Katsa
    A katsa is a field intelligence officer of Mossad. He or she collects information and runs agents, similar to the case officer of the CIA.Operation
    The word ‘katsa’ is a hebrew acronym, meaning "Collections Officer". There are typically 30-40 katsas at a time, operating mainly in Europe and somewhat in the Middle East. They have operated to a lesser degree in Africa and Asia. Some sources even suggest that they have had a presence in the United States in a unit called AL.[1][non-primary source needed] Most of the information being gathered for Israel is on the Arab world. Because it is more difficult to operate in Arab countries, the Mossad recruits many of its agents in Europe.[citation needed] While some katsas are stationed permanently in foreign countries, others are moved among operations, hence their nickname ‘jumpers’. The number of katsas is much smaller than that of other major intelligence agencies because of the sayanim, volunteer non-Israeli Jews who provide logistical support around the world. Most katsas are former members of the Israeli Defense Forces, though Mossad itself is a civilian service.Organization
    Katsas are organized under the Mossad Head of Operations, in a division known as Tsomet (intersection) or Melucha (kingdom). They are further split into three geographic branches:
    Isarelis Branch: Includes the Middle East, North Africa, Spain, and the ‘jumper’ katsas who move between operations.
    Branch B: Covers Germany, Austria, and Italy.
    Branch C: Covers United Kingdom, France, Low Countries, and Scandinavia.Training
    In searching for candidates, the Mossad administers a variety of psychological and aptitude tests, as well as assessing their own current needs. If selected, a candidate must go through and pass the Mossad training academy, the Midrasha, located near the town of Herzliya. The Mossad academy is the official summer residence of the Israeli Prime Minister. There they are taught the tradecraft of intelligence gathering for approximately three years. The main priority of training is to teach katsas how to find, recruit, and cultivate agents, including how to clandestinely communicate with them. They also learn how to avoid being the subject of foreign counter-intelligence, by avoiding car and foot surveillance, and by preventing foreign agents from creating ‘traps’ at meetings. Although katsas do not always carry a weapon, each is trained in the use of the .22 Beretta pistol. Even once training is completed, trainees will spend an apprenticeship period working on varying projects before becoming full fledged katsas..
    Clandestine HUMINT operational techniques
    The Clandestine HUMINT page deals with the functions of that discipline, including espionage and active counterintelligence. This page deals with Clandestine HUMINT operational techniques, also called "tradecraft". It applies to clandestine operations for espionage, and for a clandestine phase prior to direct action (DA) or unconventional warfare (UW). Clandestine HUMINT sources may also act as local guides for special reconnaissance (SR).
    Many of the techniques here are important in counterintelligence. Defensive counterintelligence personnel need to know them to recognize espionage, sabotage, etc. in process. Offensive counterintelligence specialists may actually use them against foreign intelligence services (FIS). While DA and UW can be conducted by national military or paramilitary organizations, al-Qaeda and similar non-state militant groups appear to use considerably different clandestine cell system structure, for command, control, and operations, than do national forces. Cell systems are evolving to more decentralized models, sometimes because they are enabled by new forms of electronic communications.
    This page deals primarily with one’s own assets. See double agent for additional information adversary sources that a country has turned to its own side…Volunteer and Proprietary SupportSayanim is a term used to describe Jews living outside Israel as foreign citizens that volunteer to provide assistance to the Mossad. This assistance includes facilitating medical care, money, logistics, and even overt intelligence gathering, yet sayanim are only paid for their expenses. No official number is known, but estimates put the number of sayanim in the thousands. The existence of this large body of volunteers is one reason why the Mossad operates with fewer case officers than fellow intelligence agencies..
    By Way of Deception
    By Way of Deception: The Making and Unmaking of a Mossad Officer is a book written by Victor Ostrovsky and Claire Hoy about Ostrovsky’s alleged career as a katsa (case officer) in the Israeli Mossad.Life story
    This claims to be a true story about Mossad as seen by Victor Ostrovsky. The first part describes his experiences with the organization. It starts when Victor is first approached by the Mossad during his service in the Israeli Defense Forces and is subjected to numerous tests, including psychological ones. While at first rejecting an offer to be trained as a recruit for the assassin’s squad, Ostrovsky eventually accepts an offer to become a katsa and joins a class of Mossad candidates going through tradecraft training. After successfully completing the training Ostrovsky begins working as a katsa.
    Throughout the book, Ostrovsky claims to reveal details of the internal workings of the Mossad itself. Ostrovsky claims that Mossad has access to Jewish helpers all around the world called sayanim (sg. sayan). Their services can supposedly be requested on short notice and no questions are asked. Because of this, Mossad only needs 30–40 active case officers at any given time. He also explains the different departments functions and how liaisons are conducted with foreign intelligence agencies

    (Wordt vervolgd)

  7. (Vervolg bronnenonderzoek naar Sayanim)…Further, conspiracies cannot be concealed for long, and there was no hard evidence of any such thing by the Catholic Church.
    Not so with the Jews!
    There clearly is at least one international conspiracy, and it is run directly by the State of Israel.
    Here is a short quote from the book "By Way of Deception" by Victor Ostrovsky (St. Martin’s, 1990), formerly a Colonel in the Israeli intelligence service "Mossad."
    Beginning on page 86:"The next day Ran S. delivered a lecture on the sayanim, a unique and important part of the Mossad’s operation. Sayanim – assistants – must be 100 percent Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not lsraeli citizens, many are reached through their relatives in Israel. An Israeli with a relative in England, for example, might be asked to write a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an organization whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way?
    "There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone, there are about 2,000 who are active, and another 5,000 on the list. They fulfill many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could get you money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so on. The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the cause. They are paid only costs."
    Continuing on page 87
    "Suppose during an operation a katsa suddenly had to come up with an electronics store as a cover. A call to a sayan in that business could bring 50 television sets, 200 VCRs – whatever was needed – from his warehouse to your building, and in next to no time, you’d have a store with $3 or $4 million worth of stock in it."
    "Since most Mossad activity is in Europe, it may be preferable to have a business address in North America. So, there are address sayanim and telephone sayanim. If a katsa has to give out an address or a phone number, he can use the sayan’s. And if the sayan gets a letter or a phone call, he will know immediately how to proceed. Some business sayanim have a bank of 20 operators answering phones, typing letters, faxing messages, all a front for the Mossad."
    And on page 88:"Katsas in the stations are in charge of the sayanim, and most active sayanim will be visited by a katsa once every three months or so, which for the katsa usually means between two and four face-to-face meetings a day with sayanim, along with numerous telephone conversations. The system allows the Mossad to work with a skeleton staff. That’s why, for example, a KGB station would employ about 100 people, while a comparable Mossad station would need only six or seven."
    On page 221, Ostrovsky gives an example of what a Sayan can be expected to do for Israel’s Mossad:
    "The Mossad already had considerable information about the Exocet, thanks in part to a sayan who worked at Aerospatiale and had passed along details. They had also conducted a small operation, sending a team to break into the plant accompanied by a missile expert flown in from Israel for the occasion. He was taken into the plant "with handles," and materials brought to him for his expert opinion. His task was to determine what they should photograph. The team spent four and a half hours inside the plant before leaving without a trace."
    It is a crime, a felony, for a civilian to participate in spying operations in this manner.
    Israel’s Mossad is exposing tens of thousands of Jews around the world to considerable legal risk, and the sayanim, being sophisticated business people, surely know this. If that is so, then why does this system work? Why is the risk acceptable?
    Here is Ostrovsky’s answer from Page 87:
    "One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you-but he won’t turn you in. You have at your disposal a non-risk recruitment system that actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from outside your own borders. It’s much easier to operate with what is available on the spot, and sayanim offer incredible practical support everywhere."
    Now one might suggest that, for example, Great Britain could use a similar system and recruit among WASPS around the world. But they don’t, because they can’t. It takes an extraordinary degree of racial solidarity and racial motivation for such a "non-risk recruitment system" to work properly. Remember, all of these activities are spying, with long prison terms if caught. Americans of English, Irish and Italian ancestry may have some residual loyalties to the old "mother country." But this residue is nothing like the racial solidarity of the Jews. Such racial feelings are so strong and so pervasive among Jews that the Mossad knew in advance that their recruitment system was "non-risk." Britain, Ireland, Italy and the Vatican know better than to try.
    While it may be true that Americans of English, Irish and Italian ancestry have dual loyalties, these white gentile dual loyalties are nothing like the degree of race-based loyalty possessed by the overwhelming majority of Jews. You have it on the authority of Mossad!
    Ostrovsky explains, beginning at the bottom of page 122:
    "We took the Brits seriously, but everyone in the building used to say they were probably deluded because of "the Bitch." That’s what they always called Margaret Thatcher inside the Mossad. They had her tagged as an anti-Semite. There was one simple question asked when anything happened: "Is it good for the Jews or not?" Forget about policies, or anything else. That was the only thing that counted, and depending on the answer, people were called anti-Semites, whether deservedly or not."The problem is that Jews _do not_ have dual loyalties!
    90% of Jews have a single loyalty. The loyalty is not necessarily to Israel, but to the welfare and power of Jews generally.
    That is the only thing that matters. The only question that ever gets asked is; "How will this affect Jews?" No other interests are taken into account at all!
    Indeed a corollary of "dual loyalty" is the goyish notion that if you sacrifice to help others, they will reciprocate. If someone helps Jews, there should be a reward.
    European gentiles assume that comity and reciprocity are inherent in the psychological makeup of all humanity. Not so, according to Ostrovsky (page 231):"The relationship between the Mossad and Danish intelligence is so intimate as to be indecent. But it’s not the Mossad’s virtue that is compromised by the arrangement; it’s Denmark’s. And that’s because the Danish are under the mistaken impression that because they saved a lot of Jews in World War II, the Israelis are grateful and they can trust the Mossad."
    No matter what you do for Jews and no matter how assiduously you toady to their interests, they will never respect yours.
    That explains why destructive welfare state policies thrive despite 40 years of soaring black illegitimacy rates and the deepening destruction of the black family and community in America. Does the policy harm blacks! Of course! But that is irrelevant. Welfare dependence has created a block that votes 90% for candidates friendly to the welfare state and to Israel. Would blacks be better off as tradesmen and entrepreneurs with stable families? Of course, but then there would be no easy way to control their votes. The hopeless dependency of most blacks increases the political power of Jews. That is why the policy continues.
    There is no comity, reciprocity or sense of obligation (dual loyalty) that causes Jews to moderate their attack on America’s blacks. Now you might ask why Clinton, the "best friend Israel has ever had at the White House", would sign welfare reform. The answer is the same. The white illegitimacy rate has reached 25%. Millions of white girls in suburban and rural areas are going on AFDC while their skin-head boyfriends camp with them at night. There is no way our masters are going to use the tax dollars at their disposal to finance the creation of Dr. Pierce’s 10 million man army 20 years from now!
    It is one thing to fool 40% of Euro-Americans who have jobs and pay taxes into believing they can get something out of the system. It is quite another to subsidize the creation of a dangerous subculture with real dollars. Jews just don’t make those kinds of mistakes. Ways can be found within the bureaucracy to continue welfare to blacks. Hence Hillary Clinton’s campaign to "fix" welfare reform.
    A classic illustration of this phenomenon comes from a book entitled "Special Tasks" (Little-Brown, 1994, 1995) written by Pavel Sudoplatov and his son Anatoly.
    Lieutenant General Pavel Sudoplatov was Joseph Stalin’s NKVD director in charge of stealing atomic secrets. He reported directly to Beria.
    From page 172:
    "The most vital information for developing the first Soviet atomic bomb came from scientists engaged in the Manhattan Project to build the American Atomic Bomb – Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Leo Szilard."
    Robert Oppenheimer was the director in charge of the Manhattan project.
    From page 186-87:
    "When it became clear that the atomic project was a heavily guarded, top-secret American priority, Eitingon and I suggested that we use our networks of illegals as couriers for our sources of information. Vassili Zarubin, our Washington rezident, instructed Kheifetz to divorce all intelligence operations from the American Communist party, which we knew would be closely watched by the FBI, and to have Oppenheimer sever all contacts with Communists and left-wingers."
    On page 188:
    "In 1943, a world-famous actor of the Moscow Yiddish State Art Theatre, Solomon Mikhoels, together with well -known yiddish poet Itzik Feffer, toured the United States on behalf of the Jewish Antifascist Committee. Before their departure, Beria instructed Mikhoels and Feffer to emphasize the great Jewish contribution to science and culture in the Soviet Union. Their assignment was to raise money and convince American public opinion that Soviet anti-semitism had been crushed as a result of Stalin’s policies. Kheifetz made sure that the message they brought was conveyed to Oppenheimer. Kheifetz said that Oppenheimer, the son of a German-Jewish immigrant, was deeply moved by the information that a secure place for Jews in the Soviet Union was guaranteed. They discussed Stalin’s plans to set up a Jewish autonomous republic in the Crimea after the war was won against facism."
    Beria understood the psychology of unitary loyalty perfectly!
    Continuing on page 189:
    "In developing Oppenheimer as a source, Vassili Zarubin’s wife, Elizabeth, was essential. She hardly appeared foreign in the United States. Her manner was so natural and sociable that she immediately made friends. Slim, with dark eyes, she had the classic Semitic beauty that attracted both men and women, and she was one of the most successful agent recruiters, establishing her own illegal network of Jewish refugees from Poland, and recruiting one of Szilard’s secretaries, who provided technical data."
    Oppenheimer’s rationale was "fear that the Germans might produce the first atomic bomb." But all he had to do to beat the Germans to the punch was to build the bomb for America. And indeed, that would have been the natural result of "dual loyalties." He could have helped Jews and remained loyal to America at the same time.
    But then helping America was not in the calculus at all. As Beria understood perfectly, he was concerned only with one unitary question; "How does this affect Jews?" And the answer was that just as organizing the blacks and browns to vote their antagonistic racial interests is critical to maintaining Jewish power over whites in the 1990’s, giving the atomic secrets to Russia was the one way to reduce the power of whites in America in the 1940s and 50s. Oppenheimer’s naive view (prior to the creation of the Israeli State) was that a nuclear armed Russia would provide one more possible haven for Jews with the power to protect them.
    The goyim in our OSS (the forerunner of the CIA) would have assumed "dual loyalty" and concluded that Oppenheimer presented no security risk.
    They were dead wrong, as Beria clearly understood.So now the question becomes: – How many sayanim does it take to "occupy America"?
    Is Madeline [Kerbel] Albright (nominee for Secretary of State) a Sayan?
    Is William Cohen (nominee for Secretary of Defense) a Sayan?
    Is William Berger (nominee for National Security Agency chief) a Sayan?
    Is Anthony Lake (nominee to head CIA) a Sayan?
    Is Robert Rubin (secretary of Treasury) a Sayan?
    Is Alan Greenspan (chairman of the Federal Reserve) a Sayan?
    Are these reasonable questions to ask?In truth, of course, it is somewhat unlikely that these people, by far the most powerful group in the United States, would agree to spend their time schlepping TV sets for Mossad, or divulging secrets. They can do far more to serve Jewish interests by guiding U.S. economic, diplomatic and defense policies to serve Israel and Jewish interests than they ever could through risky behaviors like divulging classified data.
    In fact, these people are in a far better position to put pressure on Israel than Israel is to put pressure them.
    Are the people named above capable of articulating U.S. interests (as opposed to Jewish interests) on an intellectual level?
    Of course! Quite skillfully, in fact!Are they capable of _acting_ upon those interests (our interests)?
    That is a much tougher question. For a majority, it appears that the answer is clearly "no" if Jewish insterests might also be involved. The psychological and emotional ties within the group are so strong, and they are so powerfully alienated from the white gentile majority that their decisions and actions will never match their words. Just as Oppenheimer’s actions failed to square with his words.
    Clinton’s cabinet and the media moguls who control him are likely to have their own strong views on the question "Is it good for Jews, or not?" And they are not likely to take orders from Israel. Does that mean there is no "conspiracy’?
    Other than the publicly documented spying and extortion operations run by the State of Israel, there probably isn’t one. Rather, what we have is an obsessive concern for the interests of Jews and a psychological inability to represent the interests of others that is shared by such an overwhelming majority of Jews, that their uncoordinated actions appear pre-planned.Colonel Ostrovsky notes in "By way of Deception" that Israel and its supporters have a concept of the relation between media and government that is powerfully at odds with our own Anglo-Saxon tradition that inspired the First Amendment.
    From page 290:
    "As usual in these affairs, the journalism fraternity in Israel knew about the operation all along-or at least, they knew what the Mossad and the prime minister’s office wanted them to know – but they agreed to withhold the story until they were given leave to print it. There is a committee of editors, called the Vaudat Orchim, of all the major media outlets in Israel that meets regularly with government officials for background briefing on current events. Israeli television is government controlled, as is all but one rogue radio station, so that broadcasting is never a problem to control."
    The Jewish – SDS flirtation with "free speech" at Berkeley in the 1960’s was a temporary romance of convenience. Culturally, they are more comfortable with a "Vaudat Orchim" and controlled news.
    Is Laurence Tisch (CEO of CBS,) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Robert Sarnoff (RCA and NBC) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
    How about Jeff Zuker (executive producer of NBC Nightly news)?
    Is Jeff Sagansky (head of CBS entertainment division) a Sayan? A member of a Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Stuart Bloomberg (head of entertainment programming at ABC) a Sayan? How about Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Brandon Tartikoff (Paramount Pictures) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Gerald Levin (Time Warner Communications) a Sayan? Perhaps part of a Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Michael D. Eisner (Walt Disney Co.) a Sayan? Or a Vaudat Orchim member?
    Is Martin S. Davis (Paramount Communications) a Sayan? Or a Vaudat Orchim, perhaps?
    Is Peter Chernin (20th Century Fox Film Corp.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
    How about Sandy Grushow (Fox Entertainment)? Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Peter Guber (Columbia Pictures Entertainment) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Sumner Redstone [Murray Rothstein] (Viacom, MTV, Nickelodeon) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Lew Wasserman (MCA Inc.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Ron Nessen (MBS radio news) a Sayan? – or a Vaudat Orchim?
    How about Samuel and Donald Newhouse (31 newspapers, 12 broadcast stations, 87 cable systems, Parade, New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, etc.)?
    Is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (New York Times, 33 additional papers, 7 radio and TV broadcasters a cable company and three book publishers) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Katherine Meyer Graham (Washington Post, Newsweek) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
    Is Peter Kann (Dow Jones & Co, Wall Street journal) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
    How about Mortimer B. Zuckerman (New York Daily News, U.S. News &World Report, Atlantic Monthly)?
    Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?Do these people, and dozens more in similar positions meet to discuss how to manage the news? Again, the truth is probably not. Why?
    Simple. They already know what messages must be censored and what events are newsworthy. They already know what to cover and what to leave on the cutting room floor. Except on rarest occasions, they do not need to be told what to do.
    Each of these men will have his own passionately held convictions about what kinds of news and entertainment for goyim will best serve Jewish interests. These are not the type of men who would obediently follow instructions from Isreal. But then the deep racial paranoia and the intense loathing of Christianity that is taught to most Jews as children at the dinner table ensures that many Jews will pursue careers in media (such careers are "good for Jews") and will know what to do when they get to the top of a network. They generally do not need to be told!And that, gentlemen, is the significance of "unitary racial loyalty" that exists among 90% of this world’s Jews.
    Pat Buchanan once referred to Capitol Hill as "Israeli Occupied Territory."
    Can we justifiably say that we live in "Occupied America?"
    No need to make up your minds yet. Might as well wait for parts two and three of the "Occupied America" series.
    Then you can be the judge!

  8. Mijn voorlopige conclusie, ter verdere discussie, is:Sayanim (meervoud van Sayan) zijn buiten Israel wonende Joden die onvoorwaardelijk hun diensten verlenen aan de Israelische geheime dienst Mossad dan wel, ongevraagd, op basis van hun grenzeloze loyaliteit jegens het Jodendom, de (voor hen) heilige Joodse zaak op de hen ten dienst staande wijze dienen. Hun loyaliteit t.a.v. Israel is groter dan die t.a.v. het land waarvan zij formeel staatsburger zijn.Sayanim is afgeleid van het Herbreeuwse woord lesayeah, hetgeen ‘help’ betekent.
    Hoewel er geen officiële cijfers bekend zijn, wordt het aantal sayanim geschat op enkele tien-duizenden over de wereld. De aanwezigheid van dit grote aantal vrijwilligers is een van de redenen waarom de Mossad met minder katsa’s (case officers) kan werken dan andere inlichtingendiensten.Een logische volgende vraag is: wie zijn de sayanim in Nederland?

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen. logo

Je reageert onder je account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )


Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )


Verbinden met %s