Why We Must Prosecute Bush And His Administration For War Crimes

President Bush cs moeten worden aangeklaagd wegens het bedrijven van oorlogsmisdaden, schrijft Mike Ferner – en ik ben dat volledig met hem eens, al zal dat helaas niet veel helpen bij dit lofwaardig streven.
Amerikaanse journalisten hadden zelf – en veel eerder – hun schoenen naar hun president moeten gooien, meent Dave Lindorff. De volgzaamheid van de Amerikaanse media-vertegenwoordigers t.a.v. het beleid van Bush, was inderdaad laak- en verwijtbaar. Ik denk dat de geschiedschrijving (ook) daar hard over zal oordelen, maar dat is te laat.

..Can there be a better reason for prosecuting George Bush and his administration for war crimes than those words from the chief prosecutor of the Nazis, a U.S. Supreme Court Justice, with the full support of the U.S. government? Robert Jackson’s words and the values this nation claims to stand for provide sufficient moral basis for putting Bush and Cheney, their underlings who implemented their policies and the perverted legal minds who justified them all in the dock. If those are not sufficient reasons, there is a long list of binding law and treaties – written in black and white in surprisingly plain English.

Bush imagined, and his attorneys advised, that he could simply wave aside these laws with “they don’t apply.” Imagine how a judge would treat even a simple traffic court defendant who brazenly stated the law was only a quaint notion, just “words on paper?”

Masses of people and an embarrassingly small number of their elected representatives in this country read the law for themselves and demanded otherwise, only to be silenced by the Guardians of Reality in the corporate news media.

But it’s all there, where it has been for 220 years, the Constitution’s “supremacy clause,” Article II, section 4, and in the War Crimes Act of 1996 (18USC §2441). They provide the authority to make additional treaties legally binding – no matter how much former White House lawyers David Addington and John Yoo may object…

Why We Must Prosecute Bush And His Administration For War Crimes (By Mike Ferner in ICH)

When Iraqi journalist Muntadar al-Zaidi heaved his two shoes at the head of President George W. Bush during a press conference in Baghdad, he did something that the White House press corps should have done years ago.

Al-Zaidi listened to Bush blather that the half-decade of war he had initiated with the illegal invasion of Iraq had been "necessary for US security, Iraqi stability (sic) and world peace" and something just snapped. The television correspondent, who had been kidnapped and held for a while last year by Shiite militants, pulled off a shoe and threw it at Bush-a serious insult in Iraqi culture-and shouted "This is a farewell kiss, you dog!" When the first shoe missed its target, he grabbed a second shoe and heaved it too, causing the president to duck a second time as al-Zaidi shouted, "This is from the widows, the orphans, and those who were killed in Iraq!"

I’ll admit, listening to Bush lie his way through eight years of press conferences, while pre-selected reporters played along and pretended to get his attention so they could ask questions which had been submitted and vetted in advance, I have felt like throwing my shoes at the television set.

Al-Zaidi, who paid for his courageous act of protest by being brutally beaten by security guards, is a hero of the profession. He stopped taking the president’s BS and called him what he is: a murderer and a criminal, with the blood of perhaps upwards of a million Iraqis on his hands. Al-Zaidi used what was supposed to be a staged photo-op for the president as an opportunity to speak up for those whose lives have been ruined by this president-the ones our suck-up journalists routinely ignore…

Muntadar al-Zaidi Did What We Journalists Should Have Done Long Ago (By Dave Lindorff in ICH)

Advertenties

3 thoughts on “Why We Must Prosecute Bush And His Administration For War Crimes

  1. President Bush cs moeten worden aangeklaagd wegens het bedrijven van oorlogsmisdaden, schrijft Mike Ferner – en ik ben dat volledig met hem eens, al zal dat helaas niet veel helpen bij dit lofwaardig streven.
    Het probleem met de heer van Waning is, dat hij niet aangeeft waarom hij het daar mee eens is.

  2. Het probleem is dat BUSH zowel dader als slachtoffer is. Slachtoffer van een systeem dat liegen in dienst van eigenbelang decennialang ‘goed’ heeft genoemd.
    BUSH terechtstellen zou betekenen ‘het door Harry Truman in het leven geroepen koude oorlogsdenken’ aan de schandpaal nagelen.
    Kern van die filosofie was (en is) dat alles (maar dan ook alles!) geoorloofd is, maar dat voorkomen moet worden dat de wandaden in dienst van ‘het goede’ (ander woord voor eigenbelang) zichtbaar worden gemaakt.
    Dat was mogelijk in een tijdperk waarin de media in handen waren van opportunistische leugenaars. De komst van internet heeft de macht van de leugenaars gebroken. Ze schijnen dat nog niet te beseffen…Reactie is geredigeerd

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s