Why Gentile Americans Back the Jewish State (By Walter Russell Mead in Foreign Affairs)

..Widespread gentile support for Israel is one of the most potent political forces in U.S. foreign policy, and in the last 60 years, there has never been a Gallup poll showing more Americans sympathizing with the Arabs or the Palestinians than with the Israelis.

Over time, moreover, the pro-Israel sentiment in the United States has increased, especially among non-Jews. The years of the George W. Bush administration have seen support for Israel in U.S. public opinion reach the highest level ever, and it has remained there throughout Bush’s two terms…

The American public has few foreign policy preferences that are this marked, this deep, this enduring — and this much at odds with public opinion in other countries.

In the United States, a pro-Israel foreign policy does not represent the triumph of a small lobby over the public will. It represents the power of public opinion to shape foreign policy in the face of concerns by foreign policy professionals. Like the war on drugs and the fence along the Mexican border, support for Israel is a U.S. foreign policy that makes some experts and specialists uneasy but commands broad public support. This does not mean that an "Israel lobby" does not exist or does not help shape U.S. policy in the Middle East. Nor does it mean that Americans ought to feel as they do. (It remains my view that everyone, Americans and Israelis included, would benefit if Americans developed a more sympathetic and comprehensive understanding of the wants and needs of the Palestinians.) But it does mean that the ultimate sources of the United States’ Middle East policy lie outside the Beltway and outside the Jewish community. To understand why U.S. policy is pro-Israel rather than neutral or pro-Palestinian, one must study the sources of nonelite, non-Jewish support for the Jewish state…

U.S. opinion on the Middle East is not monolithic, nor is it frozen in time. Since 1967, it has undergone significant shifts, with some groups becoming more favorable toward Israel and others less so. Considerably fewer African Americans stand with the Likud Party today than stood with the Jewish army in World War II. More changes may come. A Palestinian and Arab leadership more sensitive to the values and political priorities of the American political culture could develop new and more effective tactics designed to weaken, rather than strengthen, American support for the Jewish state. An end to terrorist attacks, for example, coupled with well-organized and disciplined nonviolent civil resistance, might alter Jacksonian perceptions of the Palestinian struggle. It is entirely possible that over time, evangelical and fundamentalist Americans will retrace Jimmy Carter’s steps from a youthful Zionism to what he would call a more balanced position now. But if Israel should face any serious crisis, it seems more likely that opinion will swing the other way. Many of the Americans who today call for a more evenhanded policy toward the Palestinians do so because they believe that Israel is fundamentally secure. Should that assessment change, public opinion polls might well show even higher levels of U.S. support for Israel.

One thing, at least, seems clear. In the future, as in the past, U.S. policy toward the Middle East will, for better or worse, continue to be shaped primarily by the will of the American majority, not the machinations of any minority, however wealthy or engaged in the political process some of its members may be.

The New Israel and the Old – Why Gentile Americans Back the Jewish State (By Walter Russell Mead in Foreign Affairs)

Opmerkingen Professor Mead heeft zich altijd afgezet tegen de visie van de hoogleraren Walt en Mearsheimer, dat de ‘Israel lobby’ – bestaande uit christen- en joodse zionisten – een onevenredige en contra-productive invloed heeft op het Midden-Oosten beleid van de VS. Het feit dat hij deHenry A. Kissinger Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations is, kan hiermee in verband staan: Henry Kissinger is zelf een (Groot-)Israel lobbyist en men mag aannemen dat iemand die zijn ‘fellowship’ bekleedt, zijn lijn volgt.

Dit laat onverlet dat dit artikel over redenen waarom in de VS, al historisch bezien, zulk een sympathie bestaat voor (Het Land) Israel, goed is. Maar dat daarenboven de invloed van de ‘Israel lobby’ buiten-proportioneel en voor de wereldvrede gevaarlijk is, staat voor mij vast.

Israel lobby (VKblogsite)

Advertenties

One thought on “Why Gentile Americans Back the Jewish State (By Walter Russell Mead in Foreign Affairs)

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s