Nederland laat zich meeslepen in onnodige en niet te winnen wereldstrijd tegen 'islamofascisme' (2

Bij het betreuren van de tweede door een aanslag in Afghanistan omgekomen militair, is het dienstig om ons te verdiepen in de achtergronden van de NAVO/ISAF-missie aldaar – en van de Nederlandse deelname aan de heilloze Global War on Terror in breder verband. In het dossier Missie Afghanistan van de Volkskrant, is een staatje geplaatst met voor- en tegenargumenten. Daarin is dit breder verband niet gelegd. Dossier Missie Afghanistan in de Volkskrant In eerdere bijdragen ben ik hier wel op ingegaan, zie: Nederland laat zich meeslepen in onnodige en niet te winnen wereldstrijd tegen ‘islamofascisme’ (2)

Advertenties

3 thoughts on “Nederland laat zich meeslepen in onnodige en niet te winnen wereldstrijd tegen 'islamofascisme' (2

  1. Welk ‘islamofascisme’ ?
    Ik zie alleen Usraelisch fascisme, waartegen helaas alleen Moslims, Ahaminejad, Putin, Chavez, en Assad zich verzetten.
    Vrijwel iedereen is het er over eens dat de VS bezetting van Irak op niets gebaseerd was wat legitiem genoemd kan worden.
    Hetzelfde geldt voor Afghanistan.
    De 1948 bezetting van Palestina door zionisten wordt nog getolereerd, maar de 1967 bezetting niet meer.
    De uitholling, als het al niet veel verder is, van elementaire burgerrechten in de VS en Engeland is beangstigend, om het voorzichtig uit te drukken.
    In de rest van W Europa is het niet veel beter, en dat alles in de strijd tegen fata morgana terrorisme.
    Privacywaakhonden in zowel Duitsland als in Nederland zijn uiterst somber over de ontwikkelingen, over hoe de overheid vrijwel alles over iedereen weet.
    Iedereen kan intussen weten dat je met brandende petroleum geen betonijzer kan smelten, maar zeer weinigen durven daar de conclusie uit te trekken dat het Bush regime willens en wetens een 2500 VS burgers heeft vermoord om een smoes te hebben in hun oorlog, een oorlog voor olie, Israel, en wereldbeheersing.
    De CIA kidnap, martel en moord vluchten zijn inmiddels, voor wie het nog niet wist, Bush tekende de order, aan de kaak gesteld.
    Maar in geen van de landen die er aan meewerkten, ook Nederland, is een storm van verontwaardiging opgestoken.
    Zoals Cindy Sheehan zei: ‘VS burgers zijn meer geïnteresseerd in wie de volgende idol wordt dan in wat Bush uitspookt in het Midden Oosten’.
    Ook de VS concentratiekampen met een capaciteit voor 400.000 personen lijken niemand wakker te maken.
    Een volk krijgt de regering die het verdient, dat lijkt inmiddels voor de hele zogenaamde vrije wereld te gelden.
    Het ons opdringen van een zogenaamde Europese grondwet lijkt de volgende stap te zijn in de totalisering van Europa.

  2. By PAUL FINDLEY
    Published Wednesday, June 06, 2007
    In the greatest service of his long public life, former President Jimmy Carter warns of the grave consequences of America’s phenomenal subservience to Israel. In his latest book and recent lectures, he focuses on how Israel’s cruel occupation, made possible by massive and unconditional U.S. support, has subjected the Palestinian people to terrible suffering for 40 long years.
    Beyond that grave human tragedy, candid observers must cite U.S. complicity in Israeli lawlessness as the major factor that prompted the horror of 9/11 and lured America into launching three costly, wrong-headed and failing wars – Afghanistan, Iraq and the war on terror. The linkage is easily identified.
    America’s support of Israel’s brutality was the main motivation for 9/11. Nine-eleven would not have happened if any U.S. president in the last 40 years had refused to finance Israel’s humiliation and destruction of Palestine. Michael Scheuer, a former CIA analyst now a consultant to CBS News, recently told a congressional committee that “our unqualified support of Israel” was the main reason for 9/11. Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni, President George W. Bush’s first special envoy to the Middle East, has stated that the United States invaded Iraq for Israel and oil.
    The U.S. acts of war in Afghanistan and the war on terror were President Bush’s retaliation for 9/11. Israel – and only Israel – urged the United States to invade Iraq. Israel’s lobby in Washington pushed hard and prevailed.
    Despite this grim record, U.S. subservience to the wishes of Israel’s leaders does not change. Israel is the only nation urging the United States to attack Iran. The lobby is pushing hard again. If the United States assaults Iran it will be on Israel’s behalf.
    Congress, like the rest of America, is totally devoid of debate on the amazing role of this small nation in critical U.S. policy. Members are fulsome in public praise of the Jewish state, but no politician mentions the illegal behavior of Israel or the staggering burden it imposes on our country.
    How did Israel gain this influence?
    It all started 40 years ago. On June 8, 1967, the U.S. commander in chief, President Lyndon B. Johnson, turned his back on the crew of a U.S. Navy ship, the USS Liberty, despite the fact that the ship was under deadly assault by Israel’s air and sea forces. The Israelis were engaged in an ugly scheme to lure America into their war against Arab states. They tried to destroy the Liberty and its entire crew, then pin the blame on the Arabs. This, they reasoned, would outrage the American people and immediately lead the United States to join Israel’s battle against Arabs.
    The scheme almost worked. It failed because, despite the carefully planned multipronged assault, the Liberty crew managed to broadcast an SOS over a makeshift antenna. When the appeal reached U.S. aircraft carriers nearby, the commanders immediately launched fighter planes to defend the ship. Informed of the launch, President Johnson ordered the rescue planes to turn back immediately.
    For the first time in history, forces of the U.S. Navy were denied the right to defend a Navy ship under attack. Johnson said, “I don’t care if the ship sinks, I am not going to embarrass an ally.” Those were his exact words, heard by Navy personnel listening to radio relays.
    The ally Johnson refused to embarrass was Israel. When the SOS reached the top military commanders in Israel, they immediately canceled the assault, claiming it was a case of mistaken identity. At the White House, Johnson accepted Israel’s claim, even though he knew it was a lie. Then Johnson magnified the day’s infamy by ordering a coverup of the truth. Liberty survivors were sworn to secrecy. Even those in hospital beds and badly wounded were threatened with court martial if they told anyone what actually happened. The coverup has been continued by every administration since Johnson’s.
    It proved to be a fateful turning point in Israel’s power over U.S. foreign policy. The Liberty experience convinced Israeli officials that they could get by with literally anything – even the murder of U.S. sailors – in their manipulation of the U.S. government. Financial aid to Israel began to pour like a river, all of it with no strings attached. According to The Christian Science Monitor, this outpouring has now cost U.S. taxpayers more than $1.4 trillion.
    Costs go far beyond money. Thousands of American families are blighted forever, with America’s once high moral standing in shambles. Because of its unqualified support of Israel, Washington is hated worldwide as never before.
    The principal source of Israel’s influence is the fear it seems to instill in every sector of our society. The most effective instrument of intimidation employed by its lobby is the reckless accusation of anti-Semitism, often leveled at anyone criticizing any aspect of Israeli behavior. I can personally certify that for many years it has cast a blanket of fear over Capitol Hill and blocked any semblance of debate.
    I unintentionally contributed to that fear in 1985 when my book, “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s lobby,” was published. It reports in detail the efficiency of Israel’s U.S. lobby, its history and tactics.
    My book became a bestseller. I hoped it would inspire public officials and other citizens to revolt against the lobby’s influence on U.S. policy, but several of my former colleagues told me it had the opposite effect. One said, “After what AIPAC did to you and (Charles) Percy, I vote with the lobby every time.”
    Israel’s grip on America seems impervious. Two distinguished political scientists, John Mearshiemer of the University of Chicago and Stephen Walt of Harvard, strode resolutely into the Middle East minefield a year ago by co-authoring a paper on Israel’s lobby. More recently, “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid,” a book written by former President Carter, revered worldwide for his effective work on international conflict resolution, was published.
    With few exceptions, America’s major editors, producers, commentators, academics and politicians have given these courageous initiatives the silent treatment. Nationwide, the lobby’s influence is pervasive, sustained and deep, a phenomenon unprecedented in U.S. history. It is impossible to explain the silence except as a reflection of profound fear.
    The situation is highly dangerous. America has already paid a towering price for our subservience to Israel, and great additional burdens seem inevitable. If the United States is involved in acts of war against Iran, anti-American protest will rise to new heights, especially throughout the Islamic world. It will inevitably deepen the widely held belief among Muslims that America seeks to undermine Islam.
    The outlook for reform is grim. Elected officials of both major political parties in Washington seem hopelessly captured by Israel’s agents. So does every serious candidate for the presidency in 2008. All U.S. citizens must accept a measure of responsibility for Israel’s grip on America. Those of us who knew what was happening did not protest with sufficient force and clarity. Those who did not know should have taken their responsibility as citizens more seriously. They should have informed themselves.
    The scene is likely to improve only if U.S. elected officials are criticized so forthrightly from home that they fear a constituent revolt more than they fear Israel’s lobby. This, of course, will not happen until the countryside benefits from a rigorous and edifying public debate about Israel’s role in our national life.
    Paul Findley, a U.S. representative from Illinois from 1961-83, lives in Jacksonville. He is the author of five books, including the Washington Post seven-week bestseller, “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby,” Chicago Review Press.

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s